Random Gemini discusses Gas Prices
In this post Stacy talks about President Bush's correct decision to not tap the strategic reserves to combat gas prices. I agree with her completely that the strategic reserve should not be used for this. She does however, include an argument that always bugs me when she brings up the idea that only people with “that huge, fuel inefficient SUV that you don't really need” are compaining. To me this seems to imply that a) only people with SUVs are complaining about high gas prices b) if you have an SUV you have no right to complain about gas prices (regardless of any mitigating circumstances that may have inspired you to buy an SUV) and/or c) high gas prices are only a problem for people who own SUVs and don’t effect anyone else. SUVs are expensive (one reason they have become a status symbol) and by and large are owned by relatively affluent people. While I am sure most of these people would rather pay less for gas, I doubt that it is a major factor for many of them and I doubt they spend much time complaining about it. The exception to this would probably be people who, in fact, truly need an SUV or similar large vehicle. Growing up as one of six children I can confidently say that a mid-size sedan does not work for all families. I am sure that my parents would have loved to have purchased smaller, cheaper, and more fuel efficient vehicles but they didn’t really want to take three trips to transport the family anywhere. This type of SUV owner, already having to make sacrifices for a vehicle that will meet his transportation needs, is as justified as anyone else in complaining about high gas prices. High gas prices disproportionately hurt the poor more than the wealthy. While there is some difference by and large a poor person will need to drive as far as a rich one and although they may have a more fuel efficient vehicle the effect of a price increase is proportionately more impacting. Added to this is the increased cost of other goods and services from increased transportation costs. I suppose that what she is really trying to say might be that the evil SUV is the cause of all our high gas price woes. While there is some justification to this, an efficient mpg rating is only one way for a person to inefficiently use fuel. Unneeded trips, air conditioned houses, lights left on all day are also inefficient and either directly or indirectly cause an increase in gas prices. Having a variety of fresh fruits and vegatable availible all year round is a luxery that uses fuel. Singling out the SUV as the great cause of high gas prices is inaccurate and unfair. Update: Random Gemini has another post on this.
4 Comments:
While I agree with most of your arguements here, I disagree with an SUV being the only choice for larger families. Having multiplied fruitfully myself, the only cost effective choice for me was a minivan. While calling the purple beast a minivan seems a misnomer, it does get better gas mileage than an SUV. I can also haul things with it like a truck and haul my kids and their friends around. I'll freely admit that I didn't want a minivan. I would have much rather had an SUV. SUVs are cool and I didn't want to be just another soccer mom. After owning the van for a couple of years, I would definitely say that's the only choice for me now. The room, versatility and fuel efficiency are incomparable (at least in my price range.) However, I will admit that minivans are relatively new and even 15 years ago, they weren't really an option. :)
I wasn't trying to state that large families must have an SUV, only that the most fuel efficient choices were not an option for them. While an SUV does get worse gas mileage than a minivan, they are not so far apart that the other benefits of an SUV might not quickly out weigh the advantages of slightly better fuel economy
I am truly of the feeling, that many people contribute to the problem by consuming more than they need to.
Replace SUV with any vehicle that isn't fuel efficient and you will get a new perspective on my argument. SUV's are merely notorious for their lack of fuel efficiency.
See my comments here:
http://airsign.blogspot.com/2004/05/oil-and-consumption.html
Post a Comment
<< Home