Kerry's problem

This interview segment with Diane Sawyer is emblamatic of John Kerry's problem:

DIANE SAWYER: Was the war in Iraq worth it? JOHN KERRY: We should not have gone to war knowing the information that we know today. DS: So it was not worth it. JK: We should not — it depends on the outcome ultimately — and that depends on the leadership. And we need better leadership to get the job done successfully, but I would not have gone to war knowing that there was no imminent threat — there were no weapons of mass destruction — there was no connection of Al Qaeda — to Saddam Hussein! The president misled the American people — plain and simple. Bottom line. DS: So if it turns out okay, it was worth it? JK: No. DS: But right now it wasn’t [ … ? … ]– JK: It was a mistake to do what he did, but we have to succeed now that we’ve done what he’s — I mean look — we have to succeed. But was it worth — as you asked the question — $200 billion and taking the focus off of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda? That’s the question. The test of the presidency was whether or not you should have gone to war to get rid of him. I think, had the inspectors continued, had we done other things — there were plenty of ways to keep the pressure on Saddam Hussein. DS: But no way to get rid of him. JK: Oh, sure there were. Oh, yes there were. Absolutely. DS: So you’re saying that today, even if Saddam Hussein were in power today it would be a better thing — you would prefer that . . . JK: No, I would not prefer that. And Diane — don’t twist here.

Now Diane Sawyer is not known for her tough, hard hitting interviews. Stragely though, she seems to have Kerry on the ropes here and after reading this excerpt I know less about what John Kerry things, what his message is, what his principles are then I knew before I read it. If Kerry has a similar performance in tonights debate his candidacy if effectively toast.