New York Times:
Saddam Hussein defiantly faced a panel of Iraqi judges today in a heavily guarded courthouse in central Baghdad, as he was asked to answer charges for a 1982 massacre and begin the long process of public reckoning for the decades of brutal repression that he brought to Iraq.
A live-television feed that began around 12:45 p.m. showed a silver-haired judge in black robes reading aloud the names of Mr. Hussein and seven other defendants. The judge sat upright in a black leather chair with a white marble wall in the background. The area where the defendants sat, most of them wearing light-blue or white robes, was surrounded by barriers of white metal bars.
I'm usually all for innocent until proven guilty, but Saddam is already 'proven' guilty and the trial is a mere formality.
As an aside, am I the only one who sees a resemblance here?
Saddam Hussein
Paul Krugman
3 Comments:
TERRIFYING!!! *covers eyes*
LOL
You gotta get Don Luskin to post it at
http://www.poorandstupid.com/chronicle.asp
I want to make it clear, that although I don't agree with Krugman's politics, his is not the same as Saddam Hussein.
I just think they look quite a bit a like.
Post a Comment
<< Home